<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How not to handle abuse&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.joeware.net/2006/03/04/248/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.joeware.net/2006/03/04/248/</link>
	<description>Information about joeware mixed with wild and crazy opinions...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjsmith</title>
		<link>http://blog.joeware.net/2006/03/04/248/comment-page-1/#comment-50751</link>
		<dc:creator>cjsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joeware.net/2006/03/04/248/#comment-50751</guid>
		<description>I had a different problem but got the same results with both Powweb and Lunarpages.  I don&#039;t trust any of them period.  They disabled by downloads directory and a few other not so nice things.  They wouldn&#039;t reply to my emails or phone calls for about 3 1/2 days.  When they did they didn&#039;t even respond to any of my questions.  I finally got a dedicated server which is somewhat expensive :(  

I actually found this page because I was searching for proxy3d.external.lmco.com.  The ip was definitely trying to hack in to my site or preparing for a hack.  I&#039;ve also had hits from other military and even gov ips but think that they have been faked or spoofed somehow.  It no longer freaks me out when the NSC (NSA) shows and downloads everything on my website.  I don&#039;t know if they are faked, but I think many of them are.  The only thing I can come up with is there is something on your site a &quot;corporation&quot; doesn&#039;t like.  These are corporate hackers who have inside connections with all the low-cost hosting sites and can turn things on and off, sign up for your forum but don&#039;t post anything etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a different problem but got the same results with both Powweb and Lunarpages.  I don&#8217;t trust any of them period.  They disabled by downloads directory and a few other not so nice things.  They wouldn&#8217;t reply to my emails or phone calls for about 3 1/2 days.  When they did they didn&#8217;t even respond to any of my questions.  I finally got a dedicated server which is somewhat expensive <img src='http://blog.joeware.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>I actually found this page because I was searching for proxy3d.external.lmco.com.  The ip was definitely trying to hack in to my site or preparing for a hack.  I&#8217;ve also had hits from other military and even gov ips but think that they have been faked or spoofed somehow.  It no longer freaks me out when the NSC (NSA) shows and downloads everything on my website.  I don&#8217;t know if they are faked, but I think many of them are.  The only thing I can come up with is there is something on your site a &#8220;corporation&#8221; doesn&#8217;t like.  These are corporate hackers who have inside connections with all the low-cost hosting sites and can turn things on and off, sign up for your forum but don&#8217;t post anything etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The things that are better left unspoken : Active Directory on separate volumes</title>
		<link>http://blog.joeware.net/2006/03/04/248/comment-page-1/#comment-21554</link>
		<dc:creator>The things that are better left unspoken : Active Directory on separate volumes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joeware.net/2006/03/04/248/#comment-21554</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft recommends using separate disk arrays because they provide higher performance and fault tolerance.&#160;RAID1 seems to be considered the standard, except for large&#160;environments.&#160;Joe&#160;from Joeware has an interesting sidenote on that: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft recommends using separate disk arrays because they provide higher performance and fault tolerance.&nbsp;RAID1 seems to be considered the standard, except for large&nbsp;environments.&nbsp;Joe&nbsp;from Joeware has an interesting sidenote on that: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
