HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
http://www.informationweek.com/industries/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=188500744
Information about joeware mixed with wild and crazy opinions…
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
http://www.informationweek.com/industries/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=188500744
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://blog.joeware.net/2006/05/26/382/trackback/
Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up. Patience is a virtue; there’s no need to re-submit your comment.
[powered by WordPress.]
27 queries. 0.344 seconds
Theme copyright © 2002–2008 Mike Little.
May 27th, 2006 at 8:13 am
This is even omre funny when You firest read this:
http://news.com.com/Beware+the+Microsoft+monoculture/2008-1009_3-6073640.html
But this should be learning for Symantec and other compnies and specially compny I work for (MS
) to never become to humble about their product, and never let yourself be blinded by marketing and other such stuff.
May 30th, 2006 at 11:03 am
Seems like you’d design your virus scanner with two components - one that has higher privileges, and opens files (with read access only), then passes the handles to the actual scanner, which runs as low privilege, so that the obvious buffer overflow attacks only get low privilege, and even if they achieve remote execution, can only scan data.
That’s how it seems, anyway.