<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So your Domain Controller decides to get stolen&#8230; what next?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.joeware.net/2006/09/05/593/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.joeware.net/2006/09/05/593/</link>
	<description>Information about joeware mixed with wild and crazy opinions...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:02:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://blog.joeware.net/2006/09/05/593/comment-page-1/#comment-3139</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joeware.net/2006/09/05/593/#comment-3139</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link to the paper Guido.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link to the paper Guido.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido</title>
		<link>http://blog.joeware.net/2006/09/05/593/comment-page-1/#comment-3101</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joeware.net/2006/09/05/593/#comment-3101</guid>
		<description>great post joe - although I also value Steve&#039;s opinion, it would be a tough business case to rebuild the forest. 

I&#039;d also mention that although RODCs will certainly improve the situation in the future, using DCs on VMs in branch-offices today will also allow an additional layer of protection against DC theft or at least the risk resulting thereof. The VM image-files should be encrypted on the host server so that the person that stole the hardware would have a difficult time to get to the actual AD database files. There is a good Whitepaper on hosting DCs as VMs written by Nathan Muggli, the PM for the RODC: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=64DB845D-F7A3-4209-8ED2-E261A117FC6B&amp;displaylang=en

/Guido

/Guido</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post joe &#8211; although I also value Steve&#8217;s opinion, it would be a tough business case to rebuild the forest. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d also mention that although RODCs will certainly improve the situation in the future, using DCs on VMs in branch-offices today will also allow an additional layer of protection against DC theft or at least the risk resulting thereof. The VM image-files should be encrypted on the host server so that the person that stole the hardware would have a difficult time to get to the actual AD database files. There is a good Whitepaper on hosting DCs as VMs written by Nathan Muggli, the PM for the RODC: <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=64DB845D-F7A3-4209-8ED2-E261A117FC6B&amp;displaylang=en" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=64DB845D-F7A3-4209-8ED2-E261A117FC6B&amp;displaylang=en</a></p>
<p>/Guido</p>
<p>/Guido</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
