Comments on: Cool new Longhorn Server feature is out of the closet… http://blog.joeware.net/2007/03/18/828/ Information about joeware mixed with wild and crazy opinions... Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:21:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: joe http://blog.joeware.net/2007/03/18/828/comment-page-1/#comment-22833 joe Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:46:33 +0000 http://blog.joeware.net/2007/03/18/828/#comment-22833 The idea, or at least as I see it, would be to create groups to match each policy and place the users into them directly when you set them up. Not sure why being in multiple groups would come into play here unless you were just linking the PSO's to random groups. If you do that, then yes you will be falling back on your PSO Precedence. I completely disagree on the being useless in large orgs comment. I do most of my work in 100k+ seats and see this as massively useful in those environments and honestly, not that difficult to manage. It isn't something that should be changing all that much. The idea, or at least as I see it, would be to create groups to match each policy and place the users into them directly when you set them up. Not sure why being in multiple groups would come into play here unless you were just linking the PSO’s to random groups. If you do that, then yes you will be falling back on your PSO Precedence.

I completely disagree on the being useless in large orgs comment. I do most of my work in 100k+ seats and see this as massively useful in those environments and honestly, not that difficult to manage. It isn’t something that should be changing all that much.

]]> By: Steve Kelly http://blog.joeware.net/2007/03/18/828/comment-page-1/#comment-22803 Steve Kelly Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:09:29 +0000 http://blog.joeware.net/2007/03/18/828/#comment-22803 Although, this is better than nothing, it will be almost useless in large organizations unless MS decides to make dynamic group membership a reality. Then I could see the real potential. The fact that users could be a member of multiple groups makes this almost pointless unless, the group were automatically based on some other factor such as another attribute or object creation. Although, this is better than nothing, it will be almost useless in large organizations unless MS decides to make dynamic group membership a reality. Then I could see the real potential. The fact that users could be a member of multiple groups makes this almost pointless unless, the group were automatically based on some other factor such as another attribute or object creation.

]]>